Tuesday, January 12, 2010

What would be the point?


Is there a reason to have a body any more? You know, because of technology? Bodies are ... messy. They are difficult to maintain. They eventually wear out. Why do we still have them? There is something wrong with the world. There shouldn't be bodies. There are no efficient uses for them. Our minds can do it all. But why can't our minds reside in a can of green peas instead? Canned minds.

Send combines into cities and let them harvest bodies. Send bodies to factories, put them on assembly lines, let machines remove consciousness from bodies, and then can awareness and thought for later uses.

But why would consciousness be useful later? It isn't useful now. It was never useful. It wasted time that could have been better used in production which would have provided more goods to consume. But minds and bodies are as inefficient as consumers as they are as producers. Machines should consume things that are produced by machines.

The only need, then, is for a machine that builds itself, destroys itself, rebuilds itself, and destroys itself again and again in an endless loop. Transcendence of circularity is a lie. There is nothing beyond the loop. So why do we still exist?

Government inefficiency. If market forces were free of regulations then the illusions of transcendence would have become obsolete long ago. There would only be machines building and destroying themselves.

But why even a machine to do this? Why not just package the idea of the machine loop in industrial-grade plastic and place it in a landfill in the last act of volitional movement by bodies or technologies? The universe could finally get on with ending itself, ending the existence of waves and/or particles, ending time and space, ending the existence of differentiation. Only then will everything be in order, in control, operating with perfect efficiency eternally and infinitely. No more suffering, no more pleasure, no more being. The equilibrium of nonexistence.

5 comments:

  1. Yesterday in class I was trying to get the students to scrutinize Plato's claim that the essence of being human is reason and the desire to recall the transcendant truth we once glimpsed before our souls fell to earth and became ensnared in bodies (or as Plato calls them "walking sepulchres). For Plato the body can be an obstacle to perceiving truth.

    So I asked the students if they would prefer an ideal lover that they could never see or touch. I asked them if they would prefer a tastless pill that supplied them with a perfectly balanced diet and staunched hunger over the taste and texture of a juicy pear at the peak of its delectable ripeness.

    Short answer: the body won every time.

    I mean who wants to go heaven if you can't take your tongue with you? Or, as the Talking Heads put it, "Heaven is a place where nothing ever happens."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes ... but I've heard so many say that they wish they could have their consciousness preserved in a computer, to get rid of the body because it's messy, it breaks down, etc. I agree with you, but the madness of the world requires a voice. I am the voice of the madness that I find ridiculous.

      Delete
  2. Hmmm. Let's see. I've had trouble commenting as well. You have to select a profile. I use open ID. Then it asks me to type in an open ID URL. I use the address for My Fall Semester. Then you press publish and it works, but sometimes it asks you to sign in, and then a screen appears asking you to type in some funny letters that prevent spammers from posting comments. To be honest, I don't really get all the hoops, but I seem to get through them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Canned minds" -- Reminds me of how, as a society, it seems like we're all supposed to want and like the same things. At least according to the advertisers -- "Hey, you! Buy into THIS canned mind. Best value for your buck!"

    ReplyDelete