Nothing that was ever is or will be until civilization ceases. Only with the cessation of the nothing of civilization will there be room for something that is not civilization and anything that is not civilization must inherently be something since civilization is the only nothing that has ever not existed. What must be paid for statements such as these are forms of currency that have never existed. Thus, debt is accumulating since the statements have been made. The debt is kept in a thoughtless ledger absent presence. When something finally comes the debt must be paid in a currency that will then exist. It is impossible to save that currency since it doesn't yet exist and yet these statements must be purchased since they are on loan from a time that isn't yet. The payments must be paid in full at the very moment that something exists. If payments are not made then the nothing of civilization will resume immediately even though within the nothing of civilization "immediately" has no meaning as it has no existence.
There is significant debt and interest accruing as each statement is written. If one existed one might say, "Stop writing those damn statements! We'll never be able to pay and the something we've fought so hard to gain will revert to nothingness yet again!" However, no one exists so such a thing has never been uttered. There has been no fighting to gain something because there is nothing that can be something within civilization. As it is or possibly might be, something may have come into existence trillions of times in the thousands of years that did not exist within the nothingness of civilization because no one who became ever had currency to pay for these statements.
Someone coming into existence might say, "But no statements exist that require payment as before this moment of something there was nothing! How could a statement be made in the nothingness of civilization." Before Something could scoff, nothingness returned. Maybe that happened but it couldn't have happened because there only ever has been the nothingness of civilization. How could nothingness "have been"? There is no one to answer the question just as there was no one who posed it.
Another might say, "That doesn't make sense! It's illogical." Who is "another," what is "sense, what is "illogical"? There's no one to explain, no one to answer. "This is incoherent nonsense." No, it isn't. It's nothing at all. How could anything be coherent or incoherent if there is no substance to any statement that could be categorized in any way? These statements that are accumulating debt do not exist. They will not exist until civilization ceases and at that time there will have to be payment. Without payment, there will be no time to answer the questions or to provide coherence--let alone incoherence--as nothing will be in the civilization that continues not to exist instead of the something that could exist were there an end to civilization and payment for statements that don't yet exist but will once there is something which won't exist because there is no currency for payment.
If any of this is confusing then you believe you exist. You don't. Within the nothingness of civilization, nothings arise that believe in somethings that have always been nothings, including the nothingness of belief and the nothings of somethings. If you say, "Well, I may as well not exist," then you would finally be onto something ... if ever there had been something to be onto, let alone an "I" that couldn't have possibly existed in the nothingness of civilization.
"This is exhausting." What is? Nothing? Nothing is exhausting? "Reading about nothing is exhausting." Fortunately, if there was fortune, neither reading nor exhaustion exist. This would be something to celebrate were there a something to celebrate, a something that could give rise to the possibility of celebrating. "I'm going to stop reading." You never started because there is no "you" that could read or stop reading. Negation itself doesn't exist as not existing doesn't exist. Nothing exists no more than something does. There isn't anything or nothing or something or everything; there is no "was, is, or will be." To be verbs insist in existence which is why these statements don't exist; every one of them isn't an assertion of being despite themselves which are not themselves because nothing is and is not and despites can't spite or de any more than be's can be. What is there to be said? Nothing. Not even nothing.
"What are these representations, though?" There are no representations. There is nothing to represent; a representation has as much of a chance of existing without the object it tries to represent as the object itself does. Nothing is being said here. Not even nothing is being said. Not even not even nothing is being said. "But each negation of the prior negation multiplies in representative somethings!" Ha! There would be laughter if there could be laughter but that's not true because there couldn't be a negation of something that can't be. Being and nothingness are not the same thing only because there are no things to be. They could be the same in the sense that they don't exist if there was anything to suggest that they don't exist. But there is nothing which is wrong because nothing isn't and nothing isn't wrong because wrong isn't.
"It's impossible to write of things that don't exist using a language that is structured in such a way that even that which doesn't exist has an existence because of the meanings of verbs which all exist!" Exactly ... not. "So ... nothing could be said that is because is isn't so even a negation uttered is a creation of something?" No. Utterances aren't. "Then what am I reading?" You are not ... not reading, not existing, not wondering, nothing ... not even nothing ... endlessly not endless but rather blank without being blank. There is a huge debt now, one that can never be paid, thus nothingness continues even though nothing that's been written is. There's nothing here. Nothing was said, there are no concepts, there could be no concepts if it could even be known that there was nothing which it can't because there isn't.
No comments:
Post a Comment